„Feminism has become an unpopular word“

The new faces of feminism: http://www.sofeminine.co.uk/personal-life/the-new-faces-of-feminism-the-sofeminine-men-behind-the-heforshe-campaign-s1041774.html
The new faces of feminism: http://www.sofeminine.co.uk/personal-life/the-new-faces-of-feminism-the-sofeminine-men-behind-the-heforshe-campaign-s1041774.html
The new faces of feminism: http://www.sofeminine.co.uk/personal-life/the-new-faces-of-feminism-the-sofeminine-men-behind-the-heforshe-campaign-s1041774.html

Da hat sich dieses weisse, erfolgreiche, westliche, junge, Model, Schauspielerin, … Rich-Kid doch tatsächlich erlaubt, sich nicht als radikale Kampffeministin zu outen, sondern auf einem ziemlich niederschwelligen Level dafür zu werben, sich der Genderdebatte so zu nähern, dass diese inklusiv wird anstatt Polaritäten aufzubauen und auszuschliessen.

Die Kritiker_INNEN – und ja, Mann staunt und wundert sich nur mehr – kommen mit abstrusen Vorwürfen und Anschüttungen:

Diese Liste ist natürlich höchst unvollständig und defizitär. Neben all der berechtigten Kritik an der #heforshe-Slacktivismus-Kampagne, einer weiteren Organisation, die zuallererst mal sich selbst ins Zentrum stellen muss, einer Botschafterin, die natürlich auch noch anderes im Leben tut und vor allem in ihrem noch jungen Leben tun wird, wäre es doch wirklich hoch an der Zeit, genauer hinzuhören und die Polarisierung sein zu lassen.

Vielleicht ist es gerade an der Zeit, sich auf die banal-einfachen Botschaften zu konzentrieren, etwa: „Der Kampf für die Rechte der Frauen wird zu oft als Synonym für Männerhass verstanden … Das muss aufhören“, oder „Wenn Männer nicht mehr kontrollieren müssen, müssen Frauen nicht mehr kontrolliert werden.“

Vielleicht erreicht man mit ganz simplen Aussagen doch mehr im Bewusstsein einer nichtakademischen, nichtbildungsbürgerlichen Upperclass Elite für Gleichberechtigung im eigentlichen Sinn, wonach Männer und Frauen dieselben Rechte und Möglichkeiten haben sollten. Vielleicht verstehen dann doch ein paar Menschen mehr, was die Genderdebatte in ihrem Ziel bedeutet: Als Lehre von der politischen, wirtschaftlichen und sozialen Gleichberechtigung der Geschlechter.

Vielleicht erreicht diese plakative Rede auch, dass sich vielen Frauen und Männer, die sich zu feministischen Themen nicht mehr äussern, weil ihnen die Debatte darum zu aggressiv geführt wurde, erneut zum Nachdenken kommen und sich bewusst werden, dass es eben auch in die andere Richtung Klischees gibt.

Vielleicht hat Emma Watson und diese sicherlich emotionale Rede und die dazugehörige weltweite Promi-Kampagne dazu geführt, dass sich das Thema selbst entradikalisiert, sich konzentriert, wieder inklusiv wird.

Ich würde es mir wünschen. Weil ich selbst die angesprochenen Ziele seit Jahren, Jahrzehnten selbst lebe und mir dessen bewusst bin.

Hier gehts zum Link auf Youtube:

Und hier der Text der Rede, gemäss UN Woman:

Today we are launching a campaign called “HeForShe.”

I am reaching out to you because I need your help. We want to end gender inequality—and to do that we need everyone to be involved.

This is the first campaign of its kind at the UN: we want to try and galvanize as many men and boys as possible to be advocates for gender equality. And we don’t just want to talk about it, but make sure it is tangible.

I was appointed six months ago and the more I have spoken about feminism the more I have realized that fighting for women’s rights has too often become synonymous with man-hating. If there is one thing I know for certain, it is that this has to stop.

For the record, feminism by definition is: “The belief that men and women should have equal rights and opportunities. It is the theory of the political, economic and social equality of the sexes.”

I started questioning gender-based assumptions when at eight I was confused at being called “bossy,” because I wanted to direct the plays we would put on for our parents—but the boys were not.

When at 14 I started being sexualized by certain elements of the press.

When at 15 my girlfriends started dropping out of their sports teams because they didn’t want to appear “muscly.”

When at 18 my male friends were unable to express their feelings.

I decided I was a feminist and this seemed uncomplicated to me. But my recent research has shown me that feminism has become an unpopular word.

Apparently I am among the ranks of women whose expressions are seen as too strong, too aggressive, isolating, anti-men and, unattractive.

Why is the word such an uncomfortable one?

I am from Britain and think it is right that as a woman I am paid the same as my male counterparts. I think it is right that I should be able to make decisions about my own body. I think it is right that women be involved on my behalf in the policies and decision-making of my country. I think it is right that socially I am afforded the same respect as men. But sadly I can say that there is no one country in the world where all women can expect to receive these rights.

No country in the world can yet say they have achieved gender equality.

These rights I consider to be human rights but I am one of the lucky ones. My life is a sheer privilege because my parents didn’t love me less because I was born a daughter. My school did not limit me because I was a girl. My mentors didn’t assume I would go less far because I might give birth to a child one day. These influencers were the gender equality ambassadors that made me who I am today. They may not know it, but they are the inadvertent feminists who are changing the world today. And we need more of those.

And if you still hate the word—it is not the word that is important but the idea and the ambition behind it. Because not all women have been afforded the same rights that I have. In fact, statistically, very few have been.

In 1995, Hilary Clinton made a famous speech in Beijing about women’s rights. Sadly many of the things she wanted to change are still a reality today.

But what stood out for me the most was that only 30 per cent of her audience were male. How can we affect change in the world when only half of it is invited or feel welcome to participate in the conversation?

Men—I would like to take this opportunity to extend your formal invitation. Gender equality is your issue too.

Because to date, I’ve seen my father’s role as a parent being valued less by society despite my needing his presence as a child as much as my mother’s.

I’ve seen young men suffering from mental illness unable to ask for help for fear it would make them look less “macho”—in fact in the UK suicide is the biggest killer of men between 20-49 years of age; eclipsing road accidents, cancer and coronary heart disease. I’ve seen men made fragile and insecure by a distorted sense of what constitutes male success. Men don’t have the benefits of equality either.

We don’t often talk about men being imprisoned by gender stereotypes but I can see that that they are and that when they are free, things will change for women as a natural consequence.

If men don’t have to be aggressive in order to be accepted women won’t feel compelled to be submissive. If men don’t have to control, women won’t have to be controlled.

Both men and women should feel free to be sensitive. Both men and women should feel free to be strong… It is time that we all perceive gender on a spectrum not as two opposing sets of ideals.

If we stop defining each other by what we are not and start defining ourselves by what we are—we can all be freer and this is what HeForShe is about. It’s about freedom.

I want men to take up this mantle. So their daughters, sisters and mothers can be free from prejudice but also so that their sons have permission to be vulnerable and human too—reclaim those parts of themselves they abandoned and in doing so be a more true and complete version of themselves.

You might be thinking who is this Harry Potter girl? And what is she doing up on stage at the UN. It’s a good question and trust me, I have been asking myself the same thing. I don’t know if I am qualified to be here. All I know is that I care about this problem. And I want to make it better.

And having seen what I’ve seen—and given the chance—I feel it is my duty to say something. English Statesman Edmund Burke said: “All that is needed for the forces of evil to triumph is for enough good men and women to do nothing.”

In my nervousness for this speech and in my moments of doubt I’ve told myself firmly—if not me, who, if not now, when. If you have similar doubts when opportunities are presented to you I hope those words might be helpful.

Because the reality is that if we do nothing it will take 75 years, or for me to be nearly a hundred before women can expect to be paid the same as men for the same work. 15.5 million girls will be married in the next 16 years as children. And at current rates it won’t be until 2086 before all rural African girls will be able to receive a secondary education.

If you believe in equality, you might be one of those inadvertent feminists I spoke of earlier.

And for this I applaud you.

We are struggling for a uniting word but the good news is we have a uniting movement. It is called HeForShe. I am inviting you to step forward, to be seen to speak up, to be the „he“ for „she“. And to ask yourself if not me, who? If not now, when?

Thank you.

expect everything | #civictech | #opendata | #entrepreneur | perfect is boring | Austrian in Zurich | open-minded | classical philologist | has a personal blog

Ein Kommentar

Schreib einen Kommentar

Deine E-Mail-Adresse wird nicht veröffentlicht.